Disease-mongering is putting people at risk,
researchers say |
Pharmaceutical
firms are inventing diseases to sell more drugs, researchers have
warned.
Disease-mongering promotes non-existent diseases and exaggerates
mild problems to boost profits, the Public Library of Science
Medicine reported.
Researchers at Newcastle University in Australia said firms were
putting healthy people at risk by medicalising conditions such as
menopause.
But the pharmaceutical industry denied it invented diseases.
 |
DISEASE-MONGERING
Restless legs - Prevalence of rare
condition exaggerated
Irritable bowel syndrome - Promoted as
a serious illness needing therapy, when usually a mild
problem
Menopause - Too often medicalised as a
disorder when really a normal part of
life |
Report authors David Henry and Ray Moynihan criticised attempts
to convince the public in the US that 43% of women live with sexual
dysfunction.
They also said that risk factors like high cholesterol and
osteoporosis were being presented as diseases - and rare conditions
such as restless leg condition and mild problems of irritable bowel
syndrome were exaggerated.
The report said: "Disease-mongering is the selling of sickness
that widens the boundaries of illness and grows the markets for
those who sell and deliver treatments.
Campaigns
"It is exemplified mostly explicitly by many pharmaceutical
industry-funded disease awareness campaigns - more often designed to
sell drugs than to illuminate or to inform or educate about the
prevention of illness or the maintenance of health."
The researchers called on doctors, patients and support groups to
be aware of the marketing tactics of the pharmaceutical industry and
for more research into the way in which conditions are presented.
They added: "The motives of health professionals and health
advocacy groups may well be the welfare of patients, rather than any
direct self-interested financial benefit, but we believe that too
often marketers are able to crudely manipulate those motivations.
"Disentangling the different motivations of the different actors
in disease-mongering will be a key step towards a better
understanding of this phenomenon."
But Richard Ley, of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical
Industry, said the research was centred on the US where the drugs
industry had much more freedom to promote their products to the
public.
"The way you can advertise is much more restricted in the UK so
it is wrong to extrapolate it.
"Also, it is not right to say the industry invents diseases, we
don't. It is up to doctors to decide what treatment to give people,
we can't tell them."